Why Forever instead of WoW 2? A developer explains WoW’s direction
WoW 2 or a renewed familiar Azeroth? A developer comment defends the existing foundation. We consider what that means for players planning a return.
A player waiting for WoW 2 and a group returning to old Azeroth may want different things. One wants to learn an entirely new game; the other wants another reason to adventure in a familiar world. Those expectations deserve separating before the Forever conversation adds a number to the name.
The developer argument: years of work are an asset
Kris Zierhut points to WoW’s continually improved engine and servers, including graphics, lighting, player handling and combat. He questions the need to start over. The comment comes from an IGN interview, reported by PC Gamer on September 14.
For us, the strength and the limit of this argument sit together. Existing technology can be a valuable foundation, but that value does not establish whether the game is enjoyable for a newcomer. A smooth-running server and an engaging first evening are different achievements. A developer’s assessment of the technology is not an independent performance test either.
We would not read the comment as a promise of a trouble-free launch. What ultimately matters to players is whether their shared evening works and combat feels good on their own setup.
The same world can offer a new beginning
Zierhut also sees opportunities to revisit original Azeroth’s story from new angles. He questions what a sequel would add beyond Forever. GamesRadar reports from the same IGN interview.

Blizzard’s What’s Next recap also confirms presentation changes: modern and Classic visual options, plus official controller support. Blizzard’s feature overview.
In our view, familiarity can make returning easier in a different way from a sequel’s name. A former player may already know their way around, but a newcomer in the group still needs a clear introduction. Nostalgia alone will not explain why their friends are excited about the dungeon at the end of the road.
A useful test would be a shared evening where the veteran does not have to explain every choice for someone else. A successful return can feel new without making everything familiar feel foreign.
What if you want a different kind of WoW?
Blizzard’s Deep Dive says combat should retain Classic’s deliberate pacing and distinct classes. The official design goal.
We find this a more useful guide to expectations than debating whether Forever counts as a sequel. Someone hoping for an entirely different style of combat may not find their answer in refining the familiar experience. That is not automatically a failure: it can simply mean that they are looking for another game.
From our perspective, a sequel’s appeal could be a clear invitation to people who know nothing about Azeroth. One new starting point would be easy to explain to a friend. Forever needs to make its own place understandable: who is it for, and what sort of evening will they have there? A longer feature list cannot answer that communication challenge on its own.
Community only happens between players
The Deep Dive presents Camping as a shared pause: players can contribute profession-crafted objects and receive benefits. Blizzard’s Camping explanation.

For us, this suggests a more interesting measure of success than a new version number. Does someone remember a player they met at camp and invite them along the following evening? If the stop becomes another buff routine, the social ambition falls short. If it introduces a new friend, even a small system could change a whole week of gaming.
We would ask an Anniversary group the same practical question: what do we want to do together when the initial excitement settles? That answer is more useful for choosing a game than a promise of the biggest possible reinvention.
An argument, not a final ruling on WoW 2
The interview comment explains arguments in Forever’s favor. We are not reporting a cancellation of WoW 2 or claiming a sequel could never happen. Our conclusion is narrower: Forever deserves evaluation on what it offers players, not as a substitute for an unrealized sequel.
Our Forever systems article covers practical features. The Forever hub also collects announcement, world and group-content news.
Interview reporting and official background
Developer comments checked September 14, 2026 through PC Gamer and GamesRadar reports on an IGN interview. We could not read IGN’s original page. System facts come from Blizzard’s panel recaps. Evaluations are our own. Images are illustrations, not gameplay.